Plate Tectonics: A Paradigm Under Threat
David Pratt
© 2000
(First published in the Journal of Scientific
Exploration, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 307-352, 2000)
Abstract. -- This paper looks at the
challenges confronting plate tectonics -- the ruling paradigm in the earth
sciences. The classical model of thin lithospheric plates moving over a global
asthenosphere is shown to be implausible. Evidence is presented that appears to
contradict continental drift, seafloor spreading and subduction, and the claim
that the oceanic crust is relatively young. The problems posed by vertical
tectonic movements are reviewed, including evidence for large areas of submerged
continental crust in today's oceans. It is concluded that the fundamental tenets
of plate tectonics might be wrong.
The idea of large-scale continental drift has been around for some 200
years, but the first detailed theory was proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912. It
met with widespread rejection, largely because the mechanism he suggested was
inadequate -- the continents supposedly plowed slowly through the denser oceanic
crust under the influence of gravitational and rotational forces. Interest was
revived in the early 1950s with the rise of the new science of paleomagnetism,
which seemed to provide strong support for continental drift. In the early 1960s
new data from ocean exploration led to the idea of seafloor spreading. A few
years later, these and other concepts were synthesized into the model of plate
tectonics, which was originally called "the new global
tectonics." According to the orthodox model of plate tectonics, the
earth's outer shell, or lithosphere, is divided into a number of large, rigid
plates that move over a soft layer of the mantle known as the asthenosphere, and
interact at their boundaries, where they converge, diverge, or slide past one
another. Such interactions are believed to be responsible for most of the
seismic and volcanic activity of the earth. Plates cause mountains to rise where
they push together, and continents to fracture and oceans to form where they
rift apart. The continents, sitting passively on the backs of the plates, drift
with them, at the rate of a few centimeters a year. At the end of the Permian,
some 250 million years ago, all the present continents are said to have been
gathered together in a single supercontinent, Pangaea, consisting of two major
landmasses: Laurasia in the north, and Gondwanaland in the south. Pangaea is
widely believed to have started fragmenting in the early Jurassic -- though this
is sometimes said to have begun earlier, in the Triassic, or even as late as the
Cretaceous -- resulting in the configuration of oceans and continents observed
today. It has been said that "A hypothesis that is appealing for its
unity or simplicity acts as a filter, accepting reinforcement with ease but
tending to reject evidence that does not seem to fit" (Grad, 1971, p. 636).
Meyerhoff and Meyerhoff (1974b, p. 411) argued that this is "an admirable
description of what has happened in the field of earth dynamics, where one
hypothesis -- the new global tectonics -- has been permitted to override and
overrule all other hypotheses." Nitecki et al. (1978) reported that in 1961 only
27% of western geologists accepted plate tectonics, but that during the
mid-1960s a "chain reaction" took place and by 1977 it was embraced by as many
as 87%. Some proponents of plate tectonics have admitted that a bandwagon
atmosphere developed, and that data that did not fit into the model were not
given sufficient consideration (e.g. Wyllie, 1976), resulting in "a somewhat
disturbing dogmatism" (Dott and Batten, 1981, p. 151). McGeary and Plummer
(1998, p. 97) acknowledge that "Geologists, like other people, are susceptible
to fads." Maxwell (1974) stated that many earth-science papers were
concerned with demonstrating that some particular feature or process may be
explained by plate tectonics, but that such papers were of limited value in any
unbiased assessment of the scientific validity of the hypothesis. Van Andel
(1984) conceded that plate tectonics had serious flaws, and that the need for a
growing number of ad hoc modifications cast doubt on its claim to be the
ultimate unifying global theory. Lowman (1992a) argued that geology has largely
become "a bland mixture of descriptive research and interpretive papers in which
the interpretation is a facile cookbook application of plate-tectonics concepts
... used as confidently as trigonometric functions" (p. 3). Lyttleton and Bondi
(1992) held that the difficulties facing plate tectonics and the lack of study
of alternative explanations for seemingly supportive evidence reduced the
plausibility of the theory. Saull (1986) pointed out that no global
tectonic model should ever be considered definitive, since geological and
geophysical observations are nearly always open to alternative explanations. He
also stated that even if plate tectonics were false, it would be difficult to
refute and replace, for the following reasons: the processes supposed to be
responsible for plate dynamics are rooted in regions of the earth so poorly
known that it is hard to prove or disprove any particular model of them; the
hard core of belief in plate tectonics is protected from direct assault by
auxiliary hypotheses that are still being generated; and the plate model is so
widely believed to be correct that it is difficult to get alternative
interpretations published in the scientific literature. When plate
tectonics was first elaborated in the 1960s, less than 0.0001% of the deep ocean
had been explored and less than 20% of the land area had been mapped in
meaningful detail. Even by the mid-1990s, only about 3 to 5% of the deep ocean
basins had been explored in any kind of detail, and not much more than 25 to 30%
of the land area could be said to be truly known (Meyerhoff et al., 1996a).
Scientific understanding of the earth's surface features is clearly still in its
infancy, to say nothing of the earth's interior. Beloussov (1980, 1990)
held that plate tectonics was a premature generalization of still very
inadequate data on the structure of the ocean floor, and had proven to be far
removed from geological reality. He wrote:
It is ... quite understandable that attempts to employ this
conception to explain concrete structural situations in a local rather than a
global scale lead to increasingly complicated schemes in which it is suggested
that local axes of spreading develop here and there, that they shift their
position, die out, and reappear, that the rate of spreading alters repeatedly
and often ceases altogether, and that lithospheric plates are broken up into an
even greater number of secondary and tertiary plates. All these schemes are
characterised by a complete absence of logic, and of patterns of any kind. The
impression is given that certain rules of the game have been invented, and that
the aim is to fit reality into these rules somehow or other. (1980, p. 303)
Criticism of plate tectonics has increased in line with the growing
number of observational anomalies. This paper outlines some of the main problems
facing the theory.
According to the classical model of plate tectonics, lithospheric plates
creep over a relatively plastic layer of partly molten rock known as the
asthenosphere (or low-velocity zone). According to a modern geological textbook
(McGeary and Plummer, 1998), the lithosphere, which comprises the earth's crust
and uppermost mantle, averages about 70 km thick beneath oceans and is at least
125 km thick beneath continents, while the asthenosphere extends to a depth of
perhaps 200 km. It points out that some geologists think that the lithosphere
beneath continents is at least 250 km thick. Seismic tomography, which produces
three-dimensional images of the earth's interior, appears to show that the
oldest parts of the continents have deep roots extending to depths of 400 to 600
km, and that the asthenosphere is essentially absent beneath them. McGeary and
Plummer (1998) say that these findings cast doubt on the original, simple
lithosphere-asthenosphere model of plate behavior. They do not, however,
consider any alternatives.
Despite the compelling seismotomographic evidence for deep
continental roots (Dziewonski and Anderson, 1984; Dziewonski and Woodhouse,
1987; Grand, 1987; Lerner-Lam, 1988; Forte, Dziewonski, and O'Connell, 1995;
Gossler and Kind, 1996), some plate tectonicists have suggested that we just
happen to live at a time when the continents have drifted over colder mantle
(Anderson, Tanimoto, and Zhang, 1992), or that continental roots are really no
more than about 200 km thick, but that they induce the downwelling of cold
mantle material beneath them, giving the illusion of much deeper roots (Polet
and Anderson, 1995). However, evidence from seismic-velocity, heat-flow, and
gravity studies has been building up for several decades, showing that ancient
continental shields have very deep roots and that the low-velocity asthenosphere
is very thin or absent beneath them (e.g. MacDonald, 1963; Jordan, 1975, 1978;
Pollack and Chapman, 1977). Seismic tomography has merely reinforced the message
that continental cratons, especially those of Archean and Early Proterozoic age,
are "welded" to the underlying mantle, and that the concept of thin (less than
250-km-thick) lithospheric plates moving thousands of kilometers over a global
asthenosphere is unrealistic. Nevertheless, many textbooks continue to propagate
the simplistic lithosphere-asthenosphere model, and fail to give the slightest
indication that it faces any problems (e.g. McLeish, 1992; Skinner and Porter,
1995; Wicander and Monroe, 1999). Geophysical data show that, far from
the asthenosphere being a continuous layer, there are disconnected lenses
(asthenolenses), which are observed only in regions of tectonic activation and
high heat flow. Although surface-wave observations suggested that the
asthenosphere was universally present beneath the oceans, detailed seismic
studies show that here, too, there are only asthenospheric lenses. Seismic
research has revealed complicated zoning and inhomogeneity in the upper mantle,
and the alternation of layers with higher and lower velocities and layers of
different quality. Individual low-velocity layers are bedded at different depths
in different regions and do not compose a single layer. This renders the very
concept of the lithosphere ambiguous, at least that of its base. Indeed, the
definition of the lithosphere and asthenosphere has become increasingly blurred
with time (Pavlenkova, 1990, 1995, 1996). Thus, the lithosphere has a
highly complex and irregular structure. Far from being homogeneous, "plates" are
actually "a megabreccia, a 'pudding' of inhomogeneities whose nature, size and
properties vary widely" (Chekunov, Gordienko, and Guterman, 1990, p. 404). The
crust and uppermost mantle are divided by faults into a mosaic of separate,
jostling blocks of different shapes and sizes, generally a few hundred
kilometers across, and of varying internal structure and strength. Pavlenkova
(1990, p. 78) concludes: "This means that the movement of lithospheric plates
over long distances, as single rigid bodies, is hardly possible. Moreover, if we
take into account the absence of the asthenosphere as a single continuous zone,
then this movement seems utterly impossible." She states that this is further
confirmed by the strong evidence that regional geological features, too, are
connected with deep (more than 400 km) inhomogeneities and that these
connections remain stable during long periods of geologic time; considerable
movement between the lithosphere and asthenosphere would detach near-surface
structures from their deep mantle roots. Plate tectonicists who accept
the evidence for deep continental roots have proposed that plates may extend to
and glide along the 400-km or even 670-km seismic discontinuity (Seyfert, 1998;
Jordan, 1975, 1978, 1979). Jordan, for instance, suggested that the oceanic
lithosphere moves on the classical low-velocity zone, while the continental
lithosphere moves along the 400-km discontinuity. However, there is no certainty
that a superplastic zone exists at this discontinuity, and no evidence has been
found of a shear zone connecting the two decoupling layers along the trailing
edge of continents (Lowman, 1985). Moreover, even under the oceans there appears
to be no continuous asthenosphere. Finally, the movement of such thick "plates"
poses an even greater problem than that of thin lithospheric plates. The
driving force of plate movements was initially claimed to be mantle-deep
convection currents welling up beneath midocean ridges, with downwelling
occurring beneath ocean trenches. Since the existence of layering in the mantle
was considered to render whole-mantle convection unlikely, two-layer convection
models were also proposed. Jeffreys (1974) argued that convection cannot take
place because it is a self-damping process, as described by the Lomnitz law.
Plate tectonicists expected seismic tomography to provide clear evidence of a
well-organized convection-cell pattern, but it has actually provided strong
evidence against the existence of large, plate-propelling convection
cells in the upper mantle (Anderson, Tanimoto, and Zhang, 1992). Many geologists
now think that mantle convection is a result of plate motion rather than
its cause, and that it is shallow rather than mantle deep (McGeary and Plummer,
1998). The favored plate-driving mechanisms at present are "ridge-push"
and "slab-pull," though their adequacy is very much in doubt. Slab-pull is
believed to be the dominant mechanism, and refers to the gravitational
subsidence of subducted slabs. However, it will not work for plates that are
largely continental, or that have leading edges that are continental, because
continental crust cannot be bodily subducted due to its low density, and it
seems utterly unrealistic to imagine that ridge-push from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
alone could move the 120°-wide Eurasian plate (Lowman, 1986). Moreover, evidence
for the long-term weakness of large rock masses casts doubt on the idea that
edge forces can be transmitted from one margin of a "plate" to its interior or
opposite margin (Keith, 1993). Thirteen major plates are currently
recognized, ranging in size from about 400 by 2500 km to 10,000 by 10,000 km,
together with a proliferating number of microplates (over 100 so far). Van Andel
(1998) writes:
Where plate boundaries adjoin continents, matters often become very
complex and have demanded an ever denser thicket of ad hoc modifications and
amendments to the theory and practice of plate tectonics in the form of
microplates, obscure plate boundaries, and exotic terranes. A good example is
the Mediterranean, where the collisions between Africa and a swarm of
microcontinents have produced a tectonic nightmare that is far from resolved.
More disturbingly, some of the present plate boundaries, especially in the
eastern Mediterranean, appear to be so diffuse and so anomalous that they cannot
be compared to the three types of plate boundaries of the basic theory.
Plate boundaries are identified and defined mainly on the basis of
earthquake and volcanic activity. The close correspondence between plate edges
and belts of earthquakes and volcanoes is therefore to be expected and can
hardly be regarded as one of the "successes" of plate tectonics (McGeary and
Plummer, 1998). Moreover, the simple pattern of earthquakes around the Pacific
Basin on which plate-tectonics models have hitherto been based has been
seriously undermined by more recent studies showing a surprisingly large number
of earthquakes in deep-sea regions previously thought to be aseismic
(Storetvedt, 1997). Another major problem is that several "plate boundaries" are
purely theoretical and appear to be nonexistent, including the northwest Pacific
boundary of the Pacific, North American, and Eurasian plates, the southern
boundary of the Philippine plate, part of the southern boundary of the Pacific
plate, and most of the northern and southern boundaries of the South American
plate (Stanley, 1989).
Geological field mapping provides evidence for horizontal crustal
movements of up to several hundred kilometers (Jeffreys, 1976). Plate tectonics,
however, claims that continents have moved up to 7000 km or more since the
alleged breakup of Pangaea. Measurements using space-geodetic techniques -- very
long baseline interferometry (VLBI), satellite laser-ranging (SLR), and the
global positioning system (GPS) -- have been hailed by some workers as having
proved plate tectonics. Such measurements provide a guide to crustal strains,
but do not provide evidence for plate motions of the kind predicted by plate
tectonics unless the relative motions predicted among all plates are
observed. However, many of the results have shown no definite pattern, and have
been confusing and contradictory, giving rise to a variety of ad-hoc hypotheses
(Fallon and Dillinger, 1992; Gordon and Stein, 1992; Smith et al.,
1994). Japan and North America appear, as predicted, to be approaching
each other, but distances from the Central South American Andes to Japan or
Hawaii are more or less constant, whereas plate tectonics predicts significant
separation (Storetvedt, 1997). Trans-Atlantic drift has not been
demonstrated, because baselines within North America and western Europe have
failed to establish that the plates are moving as rigid units; they suggest in
fact significant intraplate deformation (Lowman, 1992b; James, 1994).
Space-geodetic measurements to date have therefore not confirmed plate
tectonics. Moreover, they are open to alternative explanations (e.g. Meyerhoff
et al., 1996a; Storetvedt, 1997; Carey, 1994). It is clearly a hazardous
exercise to extrapolate present crustal movements tens or hundreds of millions
of years into the past or future. Indeed, geodetic surveys across "rift" zones
(e.g. in Iceland and East Africa) have failed to detect any consistent and
systematic widening as postulated by plate tectonics (Keith, 1993).
Fits and Misfits
A "compelling" piece of evidence that all the continents were once united
in one large landmass is said to be the fact that they can be fitted together
like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Many reconstructions have been attempted (e.g.
Bullard, Everett, and Smith, 1965; Nafe and Drake, 1969; Dietz and Holden, 1970;
Smith and Hallam, 1970; Tarling, 1971; Barron, Harrison, and Hay, 1978; Smith,
Hurley, and Briden, 1981; Scotese, Gagahan, and Larson, 1988), but none are
entirely acceptable.
In the Bullard, Everett, and Smith (1965) computer-generated fit, for
example, there are a number of glaring omissions. The whole of Central America
and much of southern Mexico are left out, despite the fact that extensive areas
of Paleozoic and Precambrian continental rocks occur there. This region of some
2,100,000 km² overlaps South America in a region consisting of a craton at least
2 billion years old. The entire West Indian archipelago has also been omitted.
In fact, much of the Caribbean is underlain by ancient continental crust, and
the total area involved, 300,000 km², overlaps Africa (Meyerhoff and Hatten,
1974). The Cape Verde Islands-Senegal basin, too, is underlain by ancient
continental crust, creating an additional overlap of 800,000 km². Several
major submarine structures that appear to be of continental origin are ignored
in the Bullard, Everett, and Smith fit, including the Faeroe-Iceland-Greenland
Ridge, Jan Mayen Ridge, Walvis Ridge, Rio Grande Rise, and the Falkland Plateau.
However, the Rockall Plateau was included for the sole reason that it could be
"slotted in." The Bullard fit postulates an east-west shear zone through the
present Mediterranean and requires a rotation of Spain, but field geology does
not support either of these suppositions (Meyerhoff and Meyerhoff, 1974a). Even
the celebrated fit of South America and Africa is problematic as it is
impossible to match all parts of the coastlines simultaneously; for instance,
there is a gap between Guyana and Guinea (Eyles and Eyles, 1993). Like
the Bullard, Everett, and Smith (1965) fit, the Smith and Hallam (1970)
reconstruction of the Gondwanaland continents is based on the 500-fathom depth
contour. The South Orkneys and South Georgia are omitted, as is Kerguelen Island
in the Indian Ocean, and there is a large gap west of Australia. Fitting India
against Australia, as in other fits, leaves a corresponding gap in the western
Indian Ocean (Hallam, 1976). Dietz and Holden (1970) based their fit on the
1000-fathom (2-km) contour, but they still had to omit the Florida-Bahamas
platform, ignoring the evidence that it predates the alleged commencement of
drift. In many regions the boundary between continental and oceanic crust
appears to occur beneath oceanic depths of 2-4 km or more (Hallam, 1979), and in
some places the ocean-continent transition zone is several hundred kilometers
wide (Van der Linden, 1977). This means that any reconstructions based on
arbitrarily selected depth contours are flawed. Given the liberties that
drifters have had to take to obtain the desired continental matches, their
computer-generated fits may well be a case of "garbage in, garbage out" (Le
Grand, 1988).
The similarities of rock types and geological structures on coasts
that were supposedly once juxtaposed are hailed by drifters as further evidence
that the continents were once joined together. However, they rarely mention the
many geological dissimilarities. For instance, western Africa and
northern Brazil were supposedly once in contact, yet the structural trends of
the former run N-S, while those of the latter run E-W (Storetvedt, 1997). Some
predrift reconstructions show peninsular India against western Antarctica, yet
Permian Indian basins do not correspond geographically or in sequence to the
western Australian basins (Dickins and Choi, 1997). Gregory (1929) held that the
geological resemblances of opposing Atlantic coastlines are due to the areas
having belonged to the same tectonic belt, but that the differences are
sufficient to show that the areas were situated in distant parts of the belt.
Bucher (1933) showed that the paleontological and geological similarities
between the eastern Alps and central Himalayas, 4000 miles apart, are just as
remarkable as those between the Argentine and South Africa, separated by the
same distance. The approximate parallelism of the coastlines of the
Atlantic Ocean may be due to the boundaries between the continents and oceans
having been formed by deep faults, which tend to be grouped into parallel
systems (Beloussov, 1980). Moreover, the curvature of continental contours is
often so similar that many of them can be joined together if they are given the
necessary rotation. Lyustikh (1967) gave examples of 15 shorelines that can be
fitted together quite well even though they can never have been in
juxtaposition. Voisey (1958) showed that eastern Australia fits well with
eastern North America if Cape York is placed next to Florida. He pointed out
that the geological and paleontological similarities are remarkable, probably
due to the similar tectonic backgrounds of the two regions.
Paleomagnetic Pitfalls
One of the main props of continental drift is paleomagnetism -- the study
of the magnetism of ancient rocks and sediments. The inclination and declination
of fossil magnetism can be used to infer the location of a virtual magnetic pole
relative to the location of the sample in question. When virtual poles are
determined from progressively older rocks from the same continent, the poles
appear to wander with time. Joining the former, averaged pole positions
generates an apparent polar wander path. Different continents yield different
polar wander paths, and from this it has been concluded that the apparent
wandering of the magnetic poles is caused by the actual wandering of the
continents over the earth's surface. The possibility that there has been some
degree of true polar wander -- i.e. a shift of the whole earth relative to the
rotation axis (the axial tilt remaining the same) -- has not, however, been
ruled out. That paleomagnetism can be unreliable is well established
(Barron, Harrison, and Hay, 1978; Meyerhoff and Meyerhoff, 1972). For instance,
paleomagnetic data imply that during the mid-Cretaceous Azerbaijan and Japan
were in the same place (Meyerhoff, 1970a)! The literature is in fact bursting
with inconsistencies (Storetvedt, 1997). Paleomagnetic studies of rocks of
different ages suggest a different polar wander path not only for each
continent, but also for different parts of each continent. When individual
paleomagnetic pole positions, rather than averaged curves, are plotted on world
maps, the scatter is huge, often wider than the Atlantic. Furthermore,
paleomagnetism can determine only paleolatitude, not paleolongitude.
Consequently, it cannot be used to prove continental
drift. Paleomagnetism is plagued with uncertainties. Merrill, McElhinny,
and McFadden (1996, p. 69) state: "there are numerous pitfalls that await the
unwary: first, in sorting out the primary magnetization from secondary
magnetizations (acquired subsequent to formation), and second, in
extrapolating the properties of the primary magnetization to those of the
earth's magnetic field." The interpretation of paleomagnetic data is founded on
two basic assumptions: 1. when rocks are formed, they are magnetized in the
direction of the geomagnetic field existing at the time and place of their
formation, and the acquired magnetization is retained in the rocks at least
partially over geologic time; 2. the geomagnetic field averaged for any time
period of the order of 105 years (except
magnetic-reversal epochs) is a dipole field oriented along the earth's rotation
axis. Both these assumptions are questionable. The gradual northward
shift of paleopole "scatter ellipses" through time and the gradual reduction in
the diameters of the ellipses suggest that remanent magnetism becomes less
stable with time. Rock magnetism is subject to modification by later magnetism,
weathering, metamorphism, tectonic deformation, and chemical changes. Moreover,
the geomagnetic field at the present time deviates substantially from that of a
geocentric axial dipole. The magnetic axis is tilted by about 11° to the
rotation axis, and on some planets much greater offsets are found: 46.8° in the
case of Neptune, and 58.6° in the case of Uranus (Merrill, McElhinny, and
McFadden, 1996). Nevertheless, because earth's magnetic field undergoes
significant long-term secular variation (e.g. a westward drift), it is thought
that the time-averaged field will closely approximate a geocentric axial dipole.
However, there is strong evidence that the geomagnetic field had long-term
nondipole components in the past, though they have largely been neglected (Van
der Voo, 1998; Kent and Smethurst, 1998). To test the axial nature of the
geomagnetic field in the past, paleoclimatic data have to be used. However,
several major paleoclimatic indicators, along with paleontological data, provide
powerful evidence against continental-drift models, and therefore
against the current interpretation of paleomagnetic data (see
below). It is possible that the magnetic poles have wandered considerably
with respect to the geographic poles in former times. Also, if in past
geological periods there were stable magnetic anomalies of the same intensity as
the present-day East Asian anomaly (or slightly more intensive), this would
render the geocentric axial dipole hypothesis invalid (Beloussov, 1990).
Regional or semi-global magnetic fields might be generated by vortex-like cells
of thermal-magmatic energy, rising and falling in the earth's mantle (Pratsch,
1990). Another important factor may be magnetostriction -- the alteration of the
direction of magnetization by directed stress (Jeffreys, 1976; Munk and
MacDonald, 1975). Some workers have shown that certain discordant paleomagnetic
results that could be explained by large horizontal movements can be explained
equally well by vertical block rotations and tilts and by inclination shallowing
resulting from sediment compaction (Butler et al., 1989; Dickinson and Butler,
1998; Irving and Archibald, 1990; Hodych and Bijaksana, 1993). Storetvedt (1992,
1997) has developed a model known as global wrench tectonics in which
paleomagnetic data are explained by in-situ horizontal rotations of continental
blocks, together with true polar wander. The possibility that a combination of
these factors could be at work simultaneously significantly undermines the use
of paleomagnetism to support continental drift.
Drift versus Geology
The opening of the Atlantic Ocean allegedly began in the Cretaceous by
the rifting apart of the Eurasian and American plates. However, on the other
side of the globe, northeastern Eurasia is joined to North America by the
Bering-Chukotsk shelf, which is underlain by Precambrian continental crust that
is continuous and unbroken from Alaska to Siberia. Geologically these regions
constitute a single unit, and it is unrealistic to suppose that they were
formerly divided by an ocean several thousand kilometers wide, which closed to
compensate for the opening of the Atlantic. If a suture is absent there, one
ought to be found in Eurasia or North America, but no such suture appears to
exist (Beloussov, 1990; Shapiro, 1990). If Baffin Bay and the Labrador Sea had
formed by Greenland and North America drifting apart, this would have produced
hundreds of kilometers of lateral offset across the Nares Strait between
Greenland and Ellesmere Island, but geological field studies reveal no such
offset (Grant, 1980, 1992). Greenland is separated from Europe west of
Spitsbergen by only 50-75 km at the 1000-fathom depth contour, and it is joined
to Europe by the continental Faeroe-Iceland-Greenland Ridge (Meyerhoff, 1974).
All these facts rule out the possibility of east-west drift in the northern
hemisphere. Geology indicates that there has been a direct tectonic
connection between Europe and Africa across the zones of Gibraltar and Rif on
the one hand, and Calabria and Sicily on the other, at least since the end of
the Paleozoic, contradicting plate-tectonic claims of significant displacement
between Europe and Africa during this period (Beloussov, 1990). Plate
tectonicists hold widely varying opinions on the Middle East region. Some
advocate the former presence of two or more plates, some postulate several
microplates, others support island-arc interpretations, and a majority favor the
existence of at least one suture zone that marks the location of a
continent-continent collision. Kashfi (1992, p. 119) comments: "Nearly all of
these hypotheses are mutually exclusive. Most would cease to exist if the field
data were honored. These data show that there is nothing in the geologic record
to support a past separation of Arabia-Africa from the remainder of the Middle
East." India supposedly detached itself from Antarctica sometime during
the Mesozoic, and then drifted northeastward up to 9000 km, over a period of up
to 200 million years, until it finally collided with Asia in the mid-Tertiary,
pushing up the Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau. That Asia happened to have an
indentation of approximately the correct shape and size and in exactly the right
place for India to "dock" into would amount to a remarkable coincidence
(Mantura, 1972). There is, however, overwhelming geological and paleontological
evidence that India has been an integral part of Asia since Proterozoic or
earlier time (Chatterjee and Hotton, 1986; Ahmad, 1990; Saxena and Gupta, 1990;
Meyerhoff et al., 1991). There is also abundant evidence that the Tethys Sea in
the region of the present Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt was never a deep, wide
ocean but rather a narrow, predominantly shallow, intracontinental seaway (Bhat,
1987; Dickins, 1987, 1994c; McKenzie, 1987; Stöcklin, 1989). If the long journey
of India had actually occurred, it would have been an isolated island-continent
for millions of years -- sufficient time to have evolved a highly distinct
endemic fauna. However, the Mesozoic and Tertiary faunas show no such endemism,
but indicate instead that India lay very close to Asia throughout this period,
and not to Australia and Antarctica (Chatterjee and Hotton, 1986). The
stratigraphic, structural, and paleontological continuity of India with Asia and
Arabia means that the supposed "flight of India" is no more than a flight of
fancy. A striking feature of the oceans and continents today is that they
are arranged antipodally: the Arctic Ocean is precisely antipodal to Antarctica;
North America is exactly antipodal to the Indian Ocean; Europe and Africa are
antipodal to the central area of the Pacific Ocean; Australia is antipodal to
the small basin of the North Atlantic; and the South Atlantic corresponds --
though less exactly -- to the eastern half of Asia (Gregory, 1899, 1901; Bucher,
1933; Steers, 1950). Only 7% of the earth's surface does not obey the antipodal
rule. If the continents had slowly drifted thousands of kilometers to their
present positions, the antipodal arrangement of land and water would have to be
regarded as purely coincidental. Harrison et al. (1983) calculated that there is
1 chance in 7 that this arrangement is the result of a random process.
Paleoclimatology
The paleoclimatic record is preserved from Proterozoic time to the
present in the geographic distribution of evaporites, carbonate rocks, coals,
and tillites. The locations of these paleoclimatic indicators are best explained
by stable rather than shifting continents, and by periodic changes in climate,
from globally warm or hot to globally cool (Meyerhoff and Meyerhoff, 1974a;
Meyerhoff et al., 1996b). For instance, 95% of all evaporites -- a dry-climate
indicator -- from the Proterozoic to the present lie in regions that now receive
less than 100 cm of rainfall per year, i.e. in today's dry-wind belts. The
evaporite and coal zones show a pronounced northward offset similar to today's
northward offset of the thermal equator. Shifting the continents succeeds at
best in explaining local or regional paleoclimatic features for a
particular period, and invariably fails to explain the global climate for
the same period. In the Carboniferous and Permian, glaciers covered parts
of Antarctica, South Africa, South America, India, and Australia. Drifters claim
that this glaciation can be explained in terms of Gondwanaland, which was then
situated near the south pole. However, the Gondwanaland hypothesis defeats
itself in this respect because large areas that were glaciated during this
period would be removed too far inland for moist ocean-air currents to reach
them. Glaciers would have formed only at its margins, while the interior would
have been a vast, frigid desert (Meyerhoff, 1970a; Meyerhoff and Teichert,
1971). Shallow epicontinental seas within Pangaea could not have provided the
required moisture because they would have been frozen during the winter months.
This glaciation is easier to explain in terms of the continents' present
positions: nearly all the continental ice centers were adjacent to or near
present coastlines, or in high plateaus and/or mountainlands not far from
present coasts. Drifters say that the continents have shifted little
since the start of the Cenozoic (some 65 million years ago), yet this period has
seen significant alterations in climatic conditions. Even since Early Pliocene
time the width of the temperate zone has changed by more than 15° (1650 km) in
both the northern and southern hemispheres. The uplift of the Rocky Mountains
and Tibetan Plateau appears to have been a key factor in the Late Cenozoic
climatic deterioration (Ruddiman and Kutzbach, 1989; Manabe and Broccoli, 1990).
To decide whether past climates are compatible with the present latitudes of the
regions concerned, it is clearly essential to take account of vertical crustal
movements, which can bring about significant changes in atmospheric and oceanic
circulation patterns by altering the topography of the continents and ocean
floor, and the distribution of land and sea (Dickins, 1994a; Meyerhoff, 1970b;
Brooks, 1949).
Biopaleogeography
Meyerhoff et al. (1996b) showed in a detailed study that most major
biogeographical boundaries, based on floral and faunal distributions, do not
coincide with the partly computer-generated plate boundaries postulated by plate
tectonics. Nor do the proposed movements of continents correspond with the
known, or necessary, migration routes and directions of biogeographical
boundaries. In most cases, the discrepancies are very large, and not even an
approximate match can be claimed. The authors comment: "What is puzzling is that
such major inconsistencies between plate tectonic postulates and field data,
involving as they do boundaries that extend for thousands of kilometers, are
permitted to stand unnoticed, unacknowledged, and unstudied" (p. 3). The
known distributions of fossil organisms are more consistent with an earth model
like that of today than with continental-drift models, and more migration
problems are raised by joining the continents in the past than by keeping them
separated (Smiley, 1974, 1976, 1992; Teichert, 1974; Khudoley, 1974; Meyerhoff
and Meyerhoff, 1974a; Teichert and Meyerhoff, 1972). It is unscientific to
select a few faunal identities and ignore the vastly greater number of faunal
dissimilarities from different continents which were supposedly once joined. The
widespread distribution of the Glossopteris flora in the southern
continents is frequently claimed to support the former existence of
Gondwanaland, but it is rarely pointed out that this flora has also been found
in northeast Asia (Smiley, 1976). Some of the paleontological evidence
appears to require the alternate emergence and submergence of land dispersal
routes only after the supposed breakup of Pangaea. For example, mammal
distribution indicates that there were no direct physical connections between
Europe and North America during Late Cretaceous and Paleocene times, but
suggests a temporary connection with Europe during the Eocene (Meyerhoff and
Meyerhoff, 1974a). Continental drift, on the other hand, would have resulted in
an initial disconnection with no subsequent reconnection. A few drifters have
recognized the need for intermittent land bridges after the supposed separation
of the continents (e.g. Tarling, 1982; Briggs, 1987). Various oceanic ridges,
rises, and plateaus could have served as land bridges, as many are known to have
been partly above water at various times in the past. It is also possible that
these land bridges formed part of larger former landmasses in the present oceans
(see below).
According to the seafloor-spreading hypothesis, new oceanic lithosphere
is generated at midocean ridges ("divergent plate boundaries") by the upwelling
of molten material from the earth's mantle, and as the magma cools it spreads
away from the flanks of the ridges. The horizontally moving plates are said to
plunge back into the mantle at ocean trenches or "subduction zones" ("convergent
plate boundaries"). The melting of the descending slab is believed to give rise
to the magmatic-volcanic arcs that lie adjacent to certain trenches.
Seafloor Spreading
The ocean floor is far from having the uniform characteristics that
conveyor-type spreading would imply (Keith, 1993). Although averaged
surface-wave data seemed to confirm that the oceanic lithosphere was symmetrical
in relation to the ridge axis and increased in thickness with distance from the
axial zone, more detailed seismic research has contradicted this simple model.
It has shown that the mantle is asymmetrical in relation to the midocean ridges
and has a complicated mosaic structure independent of the strike of the ridge.
Several low-velocity zones (asthenolenses) occur in the oceanic mantle, but it
is difficult to establish any regularity between the depth of the zones and
their distance from the midocean ridge (Pavlenkova, 1990). Boreholes
drilled in the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans have shown the extensive
distribution of shallow-water sediments ranging from Triassic to Quaternary. The
spatial distribution of shallow-water sediments and their vertical arrangement
in some of the sections refute the spreading mechanism for the formation of
oceanic lithosphere (Ruditch, 1990). The evidence implies that since the
Jurassic, the present oceans have undergone large-amplitude subsidences, and
that this occurred mosaically rather than showing a systematic relationship with
distance from the ocean ridges. Younger, shallow-water sediments are often
located farther from the axial zones of the ridges than older ones -- the
opposite of what is required by the plate-tectonics model, which postulates that
as newly-formed oceanic lithosphere moves away from the spreading axis and
cools, it gradually subsides to greater depths. Furthermore, some areas of the
oceans appear to have undergone continuous subsidence, whereas others underwent
alternating subsidence and elevation. The height of the ridge along the Romanche
fracture zone in the equatorial Atlantic is 1 to 4 km above that expected by
seafloor-spreading models. Large segments of it were close to or above sea level
only 5 million years ago, and subsequent subsidence has been one order of
magnitude faster than that predicted by plate tectonics (Bonatti and Chermak,
1981).
According to the seafloor-spreading model, heat flow should be
highest along ocean ridges and fall off steadily with increasing distance from
the ridge crests. Actual measurements, however, contradict this simple picture:
ridge crests show a very large scatter in heat-flow magnitudes, and there is
generally little difference in thermal flux between the ridge and the rest of
the ocean (Storetvedt, 1997; Keith, 1993). All parts of the Indian Ocean display
a cold and rather featureless heat-flow picture except the Central Indian Basin.
The broad region of intense tectonic deformation in this basin indicates that
the basement has a block structure, and presents a major puzzle for plate
tectonics, especially since it is located in a "midplate" setting. Smoot
and Meyerhoff (1995) have shown that nearly all published charts of the world's
ocean floors have been drawn deliberately to reflect the predictions of the
plate-tectonics hypothesis. For example, the Atlantic Ocean floor is unvaryingly
shown to be dominated by a sinuous, north-south midocean ridge, flanked on
either side by abyssal plains, cleft at its crest by a rift valley, and offset
at more or less regular 40- to 60-km intervals by east-west-striking fracture
zones. New, detailed bathymetric surveys indicate that this oversimplified
portrayal of the Atlantic Basin is largely wrong, yet the most accurate charts
now available are widely ignored because they do not conform to plate-tectonic
preconceptions. According to plate tectonics, the offset segments of
"spreading" oceanic ridges should be connected by "transform fault" plate
boundaries. Since the late 1960s, it has been claimed that first-motion studies
in ocean fracture zones provide overwhelming support for the concept of
transform faults. The results of these seismic surveys, however, were never
clear-cut, and contradictory evidence and alternative explanations have been
ignored (Storetvedt, 1997; Meyerhoff and Meyerhoff, 1974a). Instead of being
continuous and approximately parallel across the full width of each ridge,
ridge-transverse fracture zones tend to be discontinuous, with many unpredicted
bends, bifurcations, and changes in strike. In places, the fractures are
diagonal rather than perpendicular to the ridge, and several parts of the ridge
have no important fracture zones or even traces of them. For instance, they are
absent from a 700-km-long portion of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between the Atlantis
and Kane fracture zones. There is a growing recognition that the fracture
patterns in the Atlantic "show anomalies that are neither predicted by nor ...
yet built into plate tectonic understanding" (Shirley, 1998a,
b). Side-scanning radar images show that the midocean ridges are cut by
thousands of long, linear, ridge-parallel fissures, fractures, and faults. This
strongly suggests that the ridges are underlain at shallow depth by
interconnected magma channels, in which semi-fluid lava moves horizontally and
parallel with the ridges rather than at right-angles to them. The fault
pattern observed is therefore totally different from that predicted by plate
tectonics, and it cannot be explained by upwelling mantle diapirs as some plate
tectonicists have proposed (Meyerhoff et al., 1992a). A zone of thrust faults,
300-400 km wide, has been discovered flanking the Mid-Atlantic Ridge over a
length of 1000 km (Antipov et al., 1990). Since it was produced under conditions
of compression, it contradicts the plate-tectonic hypothesis that midocean
ridges are dominated by tension. In Iceland, the largest landmass astride the
Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the predominant stresses in the axial zone are likewise
compressive rather than extensional (Keith, 1993). Earthquake data compiled by
Zoback et al. (1989) provide further evidence that ocean ridges are
characterized by widespread compression, whereas recorded tensional earthquake
activity associated with these ridges is rarer. The rough topography and strong
tectonic deformation of much of the ocean ridges, especially in the Atlantic and
Indian Oceans, suggest that, instead of being "spreading centers," they are a
type of foldbelt (Storetvedt, 1997). The continents and oceans are
covered with a network of major structures or lineaments, many dating from the
Precambrian, along which tectonic and magmatic activity and associated
mineralization take place (Gay, 1973; Katterfeld and Charushin, 1973;
O'Driscoll, 1980; Wezel, 1992; Anfiloff, 1992; Dickins and Choi, 1997). The
oceanic lineaments are not readily compatible with seafloor spreading and
subduction, and plate tectonics shows little interest in them. GEOSAT data and
SASS multibeam sonar data show that there are NNW-SSE and WSW-ENE megatrends in
the Pacific Ocean, composed primarily of fracture zones and linear seamount
chains, and these orthogonal lineaments naturally intersect (Smoot, 1997b,
1998a, b, 1999). This is a physical impossibility in plate tectonics, as
seamount chains supposedly indicate the direction of plate movement, and plates
would therefore have to move in two directions at once! No satisfactory
plate-tectonic explanation of any of these megatrends has been proposed outside
the realm of ad-hoc "microplates," and they are largely ignored. The orthogonal
lineaments in the Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean, and Tasmanian Sea are also
ignored (Choi, 1997, 1999a, c).
Age of the Seafloor
The oldest known rocks from the continents are just under 4 billion years
old, whereas -- according to plate tectonics -- none of the ocean crust is older
than 200 million years (Jurassic). This is cited as conclusive evidence that
oceanic lithosphere is constantly being created at midocean ridges and consumed
in subduction zones. There is in fact abundant evidence against the alleged
youth of the ocean floor, though geological textbooks tend to pass over it in
silence. The oceanic crust is commonly divided into three main layers:
layer 1 consists of ocean floor sediments and averages 0.5 km in thickness;
layer 2 consists largely of basalt and is 1.0 to 2.5 km thick; and layer 3 is
assumed to consist of gabbro and is about 5 km thick. Scientists involved in the
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) have given the impression that the basalt
(layer 2) found at the base of many deep-sea drillholes is basement, and that
there are no further, older sediments below it. However, the DSDP scientists
were apparently motivated by a strong desire to confirm seafloor spreading
(Storetvedt, 1997). Of the first 429 sites drilled (1968-77), only 165
(38%) reached basalt, and some penetrated more than one basalt. All but 12 of
the 165 basalt penetrations were called basement, including 19 sites where the
upper contact of the basalt with the sediments was baked (Meyerhoff et al.,
1992a). Baked contacts suggest that the basalt is an intrusive sill, and in some
cases this has been confirmed, as the basalts turned out to have radiometric
dates younger than the overlying sediments (e.g. Macdougall, 1971). 101
sediment-basalt contacts were never recovered in cores, and therefore never
actually seen, yet they were still assumed to be depositional contacts. In 33
cases depositional contacts were observed, but the basalt sometimes
contained sedimentary clasts, suggesting that there might be older sediments
below. Indeed, boreholes that have penetrated layer 2 to some depth have
revealed an alternation of basalts and sedimentary rocks (Hall and Robinson,
1979; Anderson et al., 1982). Kamen-Kaye (1970) warned that before drawing
conclusions on the youth of the ocean floor, rocks must be penetrated to depths
of up to 5 km to see whether there are Triassic, Paleozoic, or Precambrian
sediments below the so-called basement. Plate tectonics predicts that the
age of the oceanic crust should increase systematically with distance from the
midocean ridge crests. Claims by DSDP scientists to have confirmed this are not
supported by a detailed review of the drilling results. The dates exhibit a very
large scatter, which becomes even larger if dredge hauls are included. On some
marine magnetic anomalies the age scatter is tens of millions of years
(Meyerhoff et al., 1992a). On one seamount just west of the crest of the East
Pacific Rise, the radiometric dates range from 2.4 to 96 million years. Although
a general trend is discernible from younger sediments at ridge crests to older
sediments away from them, this is in fact to be expected, since the crest is the
highest and most active part of the ridge; older sediments are likely to be
buried beneath younger volcanic rocks. The basalt layer in the ocean crust
suggests that magma flooding was once ocean-wide, but volcanism was subsequently
restricted to an increasingly narrow zone centered on the ridge crests. Such
magma floods were accompanied by progressive crustal subsidence in large sectors
of the present oceans, beginning in the Jurassic (Keith, 1993; Beloussov, 1980).
The numerous finds in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans of
rocks far older than 200 million years, many of them continental in nature,
provide strong evidence against the alleged youth of the underlying crust. In
the Atlantic, rock and sediment age should range from Cretaceous (120 million
years) adjacent to the continents to very recent at the ridge crest. During legs
37 and 43 of the DSDP, Paleozoic and Proterozoic igneous rocks were recovered in
cores on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the Bermuda Rise, yet not one of these
occurrences of ancient rocks was mentioned in the Cruise Site Reports or Cruise
Synthesis Reports (Meyerhoff et al., 1996a). Aumento and Loncarevic (1969)
reported that 75% of 84 rock samples dredged from the Bald Mountain region just
west of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge crest at 45°N consisted of continental-type
rocks, and commented that this was a "remarkable phenomenon" -- so remarkable,
in fact, that they decided to classify these rocks as "glacial erratics" and to
give them no further consideration. Another way of dealing with "anomalous" rock
finds is to dismiss them as ship ballast. However, the Bald Mountain locality
has an estimated volume of 80 km³, so it is hardly likely to have been rafted
out to sea on an iceberg or dumped by a ship! It consists of granitic and
silicic metamorphic rocks ranging in age from 1690 to 1550 million years, and is
intruded by 785-million-year mafic rocks (Wanless et al., 1968). Ozima et al.
(1976) found basalts of Middle Jurassic age (169 million years) at the junction
of the rift valley of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the Atlantis fracture zone
(30°N), an area where basalt should theoretically be extremely young, and stated
that they were unlikely to be ice-rafted rocks. Van Hinte and Ruffman (1995)
concluded that Paleozoic limestones dredged from Orphan Knoll in the northwest
Atlantic were in situ and not ice rafted. In another attempt to explain
away anomalously old rocks and anomalously shallow or emergent crust in certain
parts of the ridges, some plate tectonicists have argued that "nonspreading
blocks" can be left behind during rifting, and that the spreading axis and
related transform faults can jump from place to place (e.g. Bonatti and
Honnorez, 1971; Bonatti and Crane, 1982; Bonatti, 1990). This hypothesis was
invoked by Pilot et al. (1998) to explain the presence of zircons with ages of
330 and 1600 million years in gabbros beneath the Mid-Atlantic Ridge near the
Kane fracture zone. Yet another way of dealing with anomalous rock ages is to
reject them as unreliable. For instance, Reynolds and Clay (1977), reporting on
a Proterozoic date (635 million years) near the crest of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge,
wrote that the age must be wrong because the theoretical age of the site
was only about 10 million years. Paleozoic trilobites and graptolites
have been dredged from the King's Trough area, on the opposite side of the
Mid-Atlantic Ridge to Bald Mountain, and at several localities near the Azores
(Furon, 1949; Smoot and Meyerhoff, 1995). Detailed surveys of the equatorial
segment of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge have provided a wide variety of data
contradicting the seafloor-spreading model, including numerous shallow-water and
continental rocks, with ages up to 3.74 billion years (Udintsev, 1996; Udintsev
et al., 1993; Timofeyev et al., 1992). Melson, Hart, and Thompson (1972),
studying St. Peter and Paul's Rocks at the crest of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge just
north of the equator, found an 835-million-year rock associated with other rocks
giving 350-, 450-, and 2000-million-year ages, whereas according to the
seafloor-spreading model the rock should have been 35 million years. Numerous
igneous and metamorphic rocks giving late Precambrian and Paleozoic radiometric
ages have been dredged from the crests of the southern Mid-Atlantic, Mid-Indian,
and Carlsberg ridges (Afanas'yev et al., 1967). Precambrian and Paleozoic
granites have been found in several "oceanic" plateaus and islands with
anomalously thick crusts, including Rockall Plateau, Agulhas Plateau, the
Seychelles, the Obruchev Rise, Papua New Guinea, and the Paracel Islands
(Ben-Avraham et al., 1981; Sanchez Cela, 1999). In many cases, structural and
petrological continuity exists between continents and anomalous "oceanic" crusts
-- a fact incompatible with seafloor spreading; this applies, for example, in
the North Atlantic, where there is a continuous sialic basement, partly of
Precambrian age, from North America to Europe. Major Precambrian lineaments in
Australia and South America continue into the ocean floors, implying that the
"oceanic" crust is at least partly composed of Precambrian rocks, and this has
been confirmed by deep-sea dredging, drilling, and seismic data, and by evidence
for submerged continental crust (ancient paleolands) in the present southeast
and northwest Pacific (Choi, 1997, 1998; see below).
Marine Magnetic Anomalies
Powerful support for seafloor spreading is said to be provided by marine
magnetic anomalies -- approximately parallel stripes of alternating high and low
magnetic intensity that characterize much of the world's midocean ridges.
According to the Morley-Vine-Matthews hypothesis, first proposed in 1963, as the
fluid basalt welling up along the midocean ridges spreads horizontally and
cools, it is magnetized by the earth's magnetic field. Bands of high intensity
are believed to have formed during periods of normal magnetic polarity, and
bands of low intensity during periods of reversed polarity. They are therefore
regarded as time lines or isochrons. As plate tectonics became accepted,
attempts to test this hypothesis or to find alternative hypotheses
ceased. Correlations have been made between linear magnetic anomalies on
either side of a ridge, in different parts of the oceans, and with
radiometrically-dated magnetic events on land. The results have been used to
produce maps showing how the age of the ocean floor increases steadily with
increasing distance from the ridge axis (McGeary and Plummer, 1998, Fig. 4.19).
As shown above, this simple picture can be sustained only by dismissing the
possibility of older sediments beneath the basalt "basement" and by ignoring
numerous "anomalously" old rock ages. The claimed correlations have been
largely qualitative and subjective, and are therefore highly suspect; virtually
no effort has been made to test them quantitatively by transforming them to the
pole (i.e. recalculating each magnetic profile to a common latitude). In one
instance where transformation to the pole was carried out, the plate-tectonic
interpretation of the magnetic anomalies in the Bay of Biscay was seriously
undermined (Storetvedt, 1997). Agocs, Meyerhoff, and Kis (1992) applied the same
technique in their detailed, quantitative study of the magnetic anomalies of the
Reykjanes Ridge near Iceland, and found that the correlations were very poor;
the correlation coefficient along strike averaged 0.31 and that across the ridge
0.17, with limits of +1 to -1. Linear anomalies are known from only 70%
of the seismically active midocean ridges. Moreover, the diagrams of
symmetrical, parallel, linear bands of anomalies displayed in many
plate-tectonics publications bear little resemblance to reality (Meyerhoff and
Meyerhoff, 1974b; Beloussov, 1970). The anomalies are symmetrical to the ridge
axis in less than 50% of the ridge system where they are present, and in about
21% of it they are oblique to the trend of the ridge. In some areas, linear
anomalies are present where a ridge system is completely absent. Magnetic
measurements by instruments towed near the sea bottom have indicated that
magnetic bands actually consist of many isolated ovals that may be joined
together in different ways.
The initial, highly simplistic seafloor-spreading model for the
origin of magnetic anomalies has been disproven by ocean drilling (Pratsch,
1986; Hall and Robinson, 1979). First, the hypothesis that the anomalies are
produced in the upper 500 meters of oceanic crust has had to be abandoned.
Magnetic intensities, general polarization directions, and often the existence
of different polarity zones at different depths suggest that the source for
oceanic magnetic anomalies lies in deeper levels of oceanic crust not yet
drilled (or dated). Second, the vertically alternating layers of opposing
magnetic polarization directions disprove the theory that the oceanic crust was
magnetized entirely as it spread laterally from the magmatic center, and
strongly indicate that oceanic crustal sequences represent longer geologic times
than is now believed. A more likely explanation of marine magnetic anomalies is
that they are caused by fault-related bands of rock of different magnetic
properties and have nothing to do with seafloor spreading (Morris et al., 1990;
Choi, Vasil'yev, and Tuezov, 1990; Pratsch, 1986; Grant, 1980). The fact
that not all the charted magnetic anomalies are formed of oceanic crustal
materials further undermines the plate-tectonic explanation. In the Labrador Sea
some anomalies occur in an area of continental crust that had previously been
defined as oceanic (Grant, 1980). In the northwestern Pacific some magnetic
anomalies are likewise located within an area of continental crust -- a
submerged paleoland (Choi, Vasil'yev, and Tuezov, 1990; Choi, Vasil'yev, and
Bhat, 1992). Magnetic-anomaly bands strike into the continents in at least 15
places and "dive" beneath Proterozoic or younger rocks. Furthermore, they are
approximately concentric with respect to Archean continental shields (Meyerhoff
and Meyerhoff, 1972, 1974b). These facts imply that instead of being a "taped
record" of seafloor spreading and geomagnetic field reversals during the past
200 million years, most oceanic magnetic anomalies are the sites of ancient
fractures, which partly formed during the Proterozoic and have been rejuvenated
since. The evidence also suggests that Archean continental nuclei have held
approximately the same positions with respect to one another since their
formation -- which is utterly at variance with continental drift.
Subduction
Benioff zones are distinct earthquake zones that begin at an ocean trench
and slope landward and downward into the earth. In plate tectonics, these
deep-rooted fault zones are interpreted as "subduction zones" where plates
descend into the mantle. They are generally depicted as 100-km-thick slabs
descending into the earth either at a constant angle, or at a shallow angle near
the earth's surface and gradually curving around to an angle of between 60° and
75°. Neither representation is correct. Benioff zones often consist of two
separate sections: an upper zone with an average dip of 33° extending to a depth
of 70-400 km, and a lower zone with an average dip of 60° extending to a depth
of up to 700 km (Benioff, 1954; Isacks and Barazangi, 1977). The upper and lower
segments are sometimes offset by 100-200 km, and in one case by 350 km (Benioff,
1954, Smoot, 1997a). Furthermore, deep earthquakes are disconnected from shallow
ones; very few intermediate earthquakes exist (Smoot, 1997a). Many studies have
found transverse as well as vertical discontinuities and segmentation in Benioff
zones (e.g. Carr, Stoiber, and Drake, 1973; Swift and Carr, 1974; Teisseyre et
al., 1974; Carr, 1976; Spence, 1977; Ranneft, 1979). The evidence therefore does
not favor the notion of a continuous, downgoing slab.
Plate tectonicists insist that the volume of crust generated at
midocean ridges is equaled by the volume subducted. But whereas 80,000 km of
midocean ridges are supposedly producing new crust, only 30,500 km of trenches
exist. Even if we add the 9000 km of "collision zones," the figure is still only
half that of the "spreading centers" (Smoot, 1997a). With two minor exceptions
(the Scotia and Lesser Antilles trench/arc systems), Benioff zones are absent
from the margins of the Atlantic, Indian, Arctic, and Southern Oceans. Many
geological facts demonstrate that subduction is not taking place in the Lesser
Antilles arc; if it were, the continental Barbados Ridge should now be 200-400
km beneath the Lesser Antilles (Meyerhoff and Meyerhoff, 1974a). Kiskyras (1990)
presented geological, volcanological, petrochemical, and seismological data
contradicting the belief that the African plate is being subducted under the
Aegean Sea. Africa is allegedly being converged on by plates spreading
from the east, south, and west, yet it exhibits no evidence whatsoever for the
existence of subduction zones or orogenic belts. Antarctica, too, is almost
entirely surrounded by alleged "spreading" ridges without any corresponding
subduction zones, but fails to show any signs of being crushed. It has been
suggested that Africa and Antarctica may remain stationary while the surrounding
ridge system migrates away from them, but this would require the ridge marking
the "plate boundary" between Africa and Antarctica to move in opposite
directions simultaneously (Storetvedt, 1997)! If up to 13,000 kilometers
of lithosphere had really been subducted in circum-Pacific deep-sea trenches,
vast amounts of oceanic sediments should have been scraped off the ocean floor
and piled up against the landward margin of the trenches. However, sediments in
the trenches are generally not present in the volumes required, nor do they
display the expected degree of deformation (Storetvedt, 1997; Choi, 1999b;
Gnibidenko, Krasny, and Popov, 1978; Suzuki et al., 1997). Scholl and Marlow
(1974), who support plate tectonics, admitted to being "genuinely perplexed as
to why evidence for subduction or offscraping of trench deposits is not
glaringly apparent" (p. 268). Plate tectonicists have had to resort to the
highly dubious notion that unconsolidated deep-ocean sediments can slide
smoothly into a Benioff zone without leaving any significant trace. Moreover,
fore-arc sediments, where they have been analyzed, have generally been found to
be derived from the volcanic arc and the adjacent continental block, not from
the oceanic region (Pratsch, 1990; Wezel, 1986). The very low level of
seismicity, the lack of a megathrust, and the existence of flat-lying sediments
at the base of oceanic trenches contradict the alleged presence of a downgoing
slab (Dickins and Choi, 1998). Attempts by Murdock (1997), who accepts many
elements of plate tectonics, to publicize the lack of a megathrust in the
Aleutian trench (i.e. a million or more meters of displacement of the Pacific
plate as it supposedly underthrusts the North American plate) have met with
vigorous resistance and suppression by the plate-tectonics
establishment. Subduction along Pacific trenches is also refuted by the
fact that the Benioff zone often lies 80 to 150 km landward from the trench; by
the evidence that Precambrian continental structures continue into the ocean
floor; and by the evidence for submerged continental crust under the
northwestern and southeastern Pacific, where there are now deep abyssal plains
and trenches (Choi, 1987, 1998, 1999c; Smoot 1998b; Tuezov, 1998). If the
"Pacific plate" is colliding with and diving under the "North American plate",
there should be a stress buildup along the San Andreas Fault. The deep Cajon
Pass drillhole was intended to confirm this but showed instead that no such
stress is present (C. W. Hunt, 1992). In the active island-arc complexes
of southeast Asia, the arcs bend back on themselves, forming hairpin-like shapes
that sometimes involve full 180° changes in direction. This also applies to the
postulated subduction zone around India. How plate collisions could produce such
a geometry remains a mystery (Meyerhoff, 1995; H. A. Meyerhoff and Meyerhoff,
1977). Rather than being continuous curves, trenches tend to consist of a row of
straight segments, which sometimes differ in depth by more than 4 km. Aseismic
buoyant features (e.g. seamounts), which are frequently found at the juncture of
these segments, are connected with increased deep-earthquake and volcanic
activity on the landward side of the trench, whereas theoretically their
"arrival" at a subduction zone should reduce or halt such activity (Smoot,
1997a). Plate tectonicists admit that it is hard to see how the subduction of a
cold slab could result in the high heat flow or arc volcanism in back-arc
regions or how plate convergence could give rise to back-arc spreading (Uyeda,
1986). Evidence suggests that oceanic, continental, and back-arc rifts are
actually tensional structures developed to relieve stress in a strong
compressional stress system, and therefore have nothing to do with seafloor
spreading (Dickins, 1997). An alternative view of Benioff zones is that
they are very ancient contraction fractures produced by the cooling of the earth
(Meyerhoff et al., 1992b, 1996a). The fact that the upper part of the Benioff
zones usually dips at less than 45° and the lower part at more than 45° suggests
that the lithosphere is under compression and the lower mantle under tension.
Furthermore, since a contracting sphere fractures along great circles (Bucher,
1956), this would account for the fact that both the circum-Pacific
seismotectonic belt and the Alpine-Himalayan (Tethyan) belt lie on approximate
circles. Finally, instead of oceanic crust being absorbed beneath the continents
along ocean trenches, continents may actually be overriding adjacent oceanic
areas to a limited extent, as is indicated by the historical geology of China,
Indonesia, and the western Americas (Storetvedt, 1997; Pratsch, 1986; Krebs,
1975).
Vertical Tectonics
Classical plate tectonics seeks to explain all geologic structures
primarily in terms of simple lateral movements of lithospheric plates -- their
rifting, extension, collision, and subduction. But random plate interactions are
unable to explain the periodic character of geological processes, i.e. the
geotectonic cycle, which sometimes operates on a global scale (Wezel, 1992). Nor
can they explain the large-scale uplifts and subsidences that have characterized
the evolution of the earth's crust, especially those occurring far from "plate
boundaries" such as in continental interiors, and vertical oscillatory motions
involving vast regions (Ilich, 1972; Beloussov, 1980, 1990; Chekunov, Gordienko,
and Guterman, 1990; Genshaft and Saltykowski, 1990). The presence of marine
strata thousands of meters above sea level (e.g. near the summit of Mount
Everest) and the great thicknesses of shallow-water sediment in some old basins
indicate that vertical crustal movements of at least 9 km above sea level and
10-15 km below sea level have taken place (Spencer, 1977). Major vertical
movements have also taken place along continental margins. For example, the
Atlantic continental margin of North America has subsided by up to 12 km since
the Jurassic (Sheridan, 1974). In Barbados, Tertiary coals representing a
shallow-water, tropical environment occur beneath deep-sea oozes, indicating
that during the last 12 million years, the crust sank to over 4-5 km depth for
the deposition of the ooze and was then raised again. A similar situation occurs
in Indonesia, where deep-sea oozes occur above sea level, sandwiched between
shallow-water Tertiary sediments (James, 1994). The primary
mountain-building mechanism in plate tectonics is lateral compression caused by
collisions -- of continents, island arcs, oceanic plateaus, seamounts, and
ridges. In this model, subduction proceeds without mountain building until
collision occurs, whereas in the noncollision model subduction alone is supposed
to cause mountain building. As well as being mutually contradictory, both models
are inadequate, as several supporters of plate tectonics have pointed out (e.g.
Cebull and Shurbet, 1990, 1992; Van Andel, 1998). The noncollision model fails
to explain how continuous subduction can give rise to discontinuous orogeny,
while the collision model is challenged by occurrences of mountain building
where no continental collision can be assumed, and it fails to explain
contemporary mountain-building activity along such chains as the Andes and
around much of the rest of the Pacific rim. Asia supposedly collided with
Europe in the late Paleozoic, producing the Ural mountains, but abundant
geological field data demonstrate that the Siberian and East European (Russian)
platforms have formed a single continent since Precambrian times (Meyerhoff and
Meyerhoff, 1974a). McGeary and Plummer (1998) state that the plate-tectonic
reconstruction of the formation of the Appalachians in terms of three successive
collisions of North America seems "too implausible even for a science fiction
plot" (p. 114), but add that an understanding of plate tectonics makes the
theory more palatable. Ollier (1990), on the other hand, states that fanciful
plate-tectonic explanations ignore all the geomorphology and much of the known
geological history of the Appalachians. He also says that of all the possible
mechanisms that might account for the Alps, the collision of the African and
European plates is the most naive. The Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau
were supposedly uplifted by the collision of the Indian plate with the Asian
plate. However, this fails to explain why the beds on either side of the
supposed collision zone remain comparatively undisturbed and low-dipping,
whereas the Himalayas have been uplifted, supposedly as a consequence, some 100
km away, along with the Kunlun mountains to the north of the Tibetan Plateau.
River terraces in various parts of the Himalayas are almost perfectly horizontal
and untilted, suggesting that the Himalayas were uplifted vertically, rather
than as the result of horizontal compression (Ahmad, 1990). Collision models
generally assume that the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau began during or after
the early Eocene (post-50 million years), but paleontological,
paleoclimatological, paleoecological, and sedimentological data conclusively
show that major uplift could not have occurred before earliest Pliocene time (5
million years ago) (Meyerhoff, 1995). There is ample evidence that mantle
heat flow and material transport can cause significant changes in crustal
thickness, composition, and density, resulting in substantial uplifts and
subsidences. This is emphasized in many of the alternative hypotheses to plate
tectonics (for an overview, see Yano and Suzuki, 1999), such as the model of
endogenous regimes (Beloussov, 1980, 1981, 1990, 1992; Pavlenkova, 1995, 1998).
Plate tectonicists, too, increasingly invoke mantle diapirism as a mechanism for
generating or promoting tectogenesis; there is now abundant evidence that
shallow magma chambers are ubiquitous beneath active tectonic belts. The
popular hypothesis that crustal stretching was the main cause of the formation
of deep sedimentary basins on continental crust has been contradicted by
numerous studies; mantle upwelling processes and lithospheric density increases
are increasingly being recognized as an alternative mechanism (Pavlenkova, 1998;
Artyushkov 1992; Artyushkov and Baer, 1983; Anfiloff, 1992; Zorin and Lepina,
1989). This may involve gabbro-eclogite phase transformations in the lower crust
(Artyushkov 1992; Haxby, Turcotte, and Bird, 1976; Joyner, 1967), a process that
has also been proposed as a possible explanation for the continuing subsidence
of the North Sea Basin, where there is likewise no evidence of large-scale
stretching (Collette, 1968). Plate tectonics predicts simple heat-flow
patterns around the earth. There should be a broad band of high heat flow
beneath the full length of the midocean rift system, and parallel bands of high
and low heat flow along the Benioff zones. Intraplate regions are predicted to
have low heat flow. The pattern actually observed is quite different. There are
criss-crossing bands of high heat flow covering the entire surface of the earth
(Meyerhoff et al., 1996a). Intra-plate volcanism is usually attributed to
"mantle plumes" -- upwellings of hot material from deep in the mantle,
presumably the core-mantle boundary. The movement of plates over the plumes is
said to give rise to hotspot trails (chains of volcanic islands and seamounts).
Such trails should therefore show an age progression from one end to the other,
but a large majority show little or no age progression (Keith, 1993; Baksi,
1999). On the basis of geological, geochemical, and geophysical evidence, Sheth
(1999) argued that the plume hypothesis is ill-founded, artificial, and invalid,
and has led earth scientists up a blind alley. Active tectonic belts are
located in bands of high heat flow, which are also characterized by several
other phenomena that do not readily fit in with the plate-tectonics hypothesis.
These include: bands of microearthquakes (including "diffuse plate boundaries")
that do not coincide with plate-tectonic predicted locations; segmented belts of
linear faults, fractures, and fissures; segmented belts of mantle upwellings and
diapirs; vortical geological structures; linear lenses of anomalous
(low-velocity) upper mantle that are commonly overlain by shallower, smaller
low-velocity zones; the existence of bisymmetrical deformation in all foldbelts,
with coexisting states of compression and tension; strike-slip zones and similar
tectonic lines ranging from simple rifts to Verschluckungszonen
("engulfment zones"); eastward-shifting tectonic-magmatic belts; and geothermal
zones. Investigation of these phenomena has led to the development of a major
new hypothesis of geodynamics, known as surge tectonics, which rejects
both seafloor spreading and continental drift (Meyerhoff et al., 1992b, 1996a;
Meyerhoff, 1995). Surge tectonics postulates that all the major features
of the earth's surface, including rifts, foldbelts, metamorphic belts, and
strike-slip zones, are underlain by shallow (less than 80 km) magma chambers and
channels (known as "surge channels"). Seismotomographic data suggest that surge
channels form an interconnected worldwide network, which has been dubbed "the
earth's cardiovascular system." Surge channels coincide with the lenses of
anomalous mantle and associated low-velocity zones referred to above, and active
channels are also characterized by high heat flow and microseismicity. Magma
from the asthenosphere flows slowly through active channels at the rate of a few
centimeters a year. Horizontal flow is demonstrated by two major surface
features: linear, belt-parallel faults, fractures, and fissures; and the
division of tectonic belts into fairly uniform segments. The same features
characterize all lava flows and tunnels, and have also been observed on Mars,
Venus, and several moons of the outer planets. Surge tectonics postulates
that the main cause of geodynamics is lithosphere compression, generated by the
cooling and contraction of the earth. As compression increases during a
geotectonic cycle, it causes the magma to move through a channel in pulsed
surges and eventually to rupture it, so that the contents of the channel surge
bilaterally upward and outward to initiate tectogenesis. The asthenosphere (in
regions where it is present) alternately contracts during periods of tectonic
activity and expands during periods of tectonic quiescence. The earth's
rotation, combined with differential lag between the more rigid lithosphere
above and the more fluid asthenosphere below, causes the fluid or semifluid
materials to move predominantly eastward. This explains the eastward migration
through time of many magmatic or volcanic arcs, batholiths, rifts, depocenters,
and foldbelts.
The Continents
It is a striking fact that nearly all the sedimentary rocks composing the
continents were laid down under the sea. The continents have suffered repeated
marine inundations, but because sediments were mostly deposited in shallow water
(less than 250 m), the seas are described as "epicontinental." Marine
transgressions and regressions are usually attributed mainly to eustatic changes
of sea level caused by alterations in the volume of midocean ridges. Van Andel
(1994) points out that this explanation cannot account for the 100 or so briefer
cycles of sea-level changes, especially since transgressions and regressions are
not always simultaneous all over the globe. He proposes that large regions or
whole continents must undergo slow vertical, epeirogenic movements, which he
attributes to an uneven distribution of temperature and density in the mantle,
combined with convective flow. Some workers have linked marine inundations and
withdrawals to a global thermal cycle, bringing about continental uplift and
subsidence (Rutland, 1982; Sloss and Speed, 1974). Van Andel (1994) admits that
epeirogenic movements "fit poorly into plate tectonics" (p. 170), and are
therefore largely ignored.
Van Andel (1994) asserts that "plates" rise or fall by no more than a
few hundred meters -- this being the maximum depth of most "epicontinental"
seas. However, this overlooks an elementary fact: huge thicknesses of sediments
were often deposited during marine incursions, often requiring vertical crustal
movements of many kilometers. Sediments accumulate in regions of
subsidence, and their thickness is usually close to the degree of downwarping.
In the unstable, mobile belts bordering stable continental platforms, many
geosynclinal troughs and circular depressions have accumulated sedimentary
thicknesses of 10 to 14 km, and in some cases of 20 km. Although the sedimentary
cover on the platforms themselves is often less than 1.5 km thick, basins with
sedimentary thicknesses of 10 km and even 20 km are not unknown (C. B. Hunt,
1992; Dillon, 1974; Beloussov, 1981; Pavlenkova, 1998). Subsidence cannot
be attributed solely to the weight of the accumulating sediments because the
density of sedimentary rocks is much lower than that of the subcrustal material;
for instance, the deposition of 1 km of marine sediment will cause only half a
kilometer or so of subsidence (Holmes, 1965; Jeffreys, 1976). Moreover,
sedimentary basins require not only continual depression of the base of the
basin to accommodate more sediments, but also continuous uplift of adjacent land
to provide a source for the sediments. In geosynclines, subsidence has commonly
been followed by uplift and folding to produce mountain ranges, and this can
obviously not be accounted for by changes in surface loading. The complex
history of the oscillating uplift and subsidence of the crust appears to require
deep-seated changes in lithospheric composition and density, and vertical and
horizontal movements of mantle material. That density is not the only factor
involved is shown by the fact that in regions of tectonic activity vertical
movements often intensify gravity anomalies rather than acting to restore
isostatic equilibrium. For example, the Greater Caucasus is overloaded, yet it
is rising rather than subsiding (Beloussov, 1980; Jeffreys, 1976). In
regions where all the sediments were laid down in shallow water, subsidence must
somehow have kept pace with sedimentation. In eugeosynclines, on the other hand,
subsidence proceeded faster than sedimentation, resulting in a marine basin
several kilometers deep. Examples of eugeosynclines prior to the uplift stage
are the Sayans in the Early Paleozoic, the eastern slope of the Urals in the
Early and Middle Paleozoic, the Alps in the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, and
the Sierra Nevada in the Triassic (Beloussov, 1980). Plate tectonicists often
claim that geosynclines are formed solely at plate margins at the boundaries
between continents and oceans. However, there are many examples of geosynclines
having formed in intracontinental settings (Holmes, 1965), and the belief that
the ophiolites found in certain geosynclinal areas are invariably remnants of
oceanic crust is contradicted by a large volume of evidence (Beloussov, 1981;
Bhat, 1987; Luts, 1990; Sheth, 1997).
The Oceans
In the past, sialic clastic material has been transported to today's
continents from the direction of the present-day oceans, where there must have
been considerable areas of land that underwent erosion (Dickins, Choi, and
Yeates, 1992; Beloussov, 1962). For instance, the Paleozoic geosyncline along
the seaboard of eastern North America, an area now occupied by the Appalachian
mountains, was fed by sialic clasts from a borderland ("Appalachia") in the
adjacent Atlantic. Other submerged borderlands include the North Atlantic
Continent or Scandia (west of Spitsbergen and Scotland), Cascadia (west of the
Sierra Nevada), and Melanesia (southeast of Asia and east of Australia)
(Umbgrove, 1947; Gilluly, 1955; Holmes, 1965). A million cubic kilometers of
Devonian micaceous sediments from Bolivia to Argentina imply an extensive
continental source to the west where there is now the deep Pacific Ocean (Carey,
1994). During Paleozoic-Mesozoic-Paleogene times, the Japanese geosyncline was
supplied with sediments from land areas in the Pacific (Choi, 1984,
1987). When trying to explain sediment sources, plate tectonicists
sometimes argue that sediments were derived from the existing continents during
periods when they were supposedly closer together (Bahlburg, 1993; Dickins,
1994a; Holmes, 1965). Where necessary, they postulate small former land areas
(microcontinents or island arcs), which have since been either subducted or
accreted against continental margins as "exotic terranes" (Nur and Ben-Avraham,
1982; Kumon et al., 1988; Choi, 1984). However, mounting evidence is being
uncovered that favors the foundering of sizable continental landmasses, whose
remnants are still present under the ocean floor (see below). Oceanic
crust is regarded as much thinner and denser than continental crust: the crust
beneath oceans is said to average about 7 km thick and to be composed largely of
basalt and gabbro, whereas continental crust averages about 35 km thick and
consists chiefly of granitic rock capped by sedimentary rocks. However, ancient
continental rocks and crustal types intermediate between standard "continental"
and "oceanic" crust are increasingly being discovered in the oceans (Sanchez
Cela, 1999), and this is a serious embarrassment for plate tectonics. The
traditional picture of the crust beneath oceans being universally thin and
graniteless may well be further undermined in the future, as oceanic drilling
and seismic research continue. One difficulty is to distinguish the boundary
between the lower oceanic crust and upper mantle in areas where high- and
low-velocity layers alternate (Orlenok, 1986; Choi, Vasil'yev, and Bhat, 1992).
For example, the crust under the Kuril deep-sea basin is 8 km thick if the 7.9
km/s velocity layer is taken as the crust-mantle boundary (Moho), but 20-30 km
thick if the 8.2 or 8.4 km/s layer is taken as the Moho (Tuezov,
1998). Small ocean basins cover an area equal to about 5% of that of the
continents, and are characterized by transitional types of crust (Menard, 1967).
This applies to the Caribbean Sea, the Gulf of Mexico, the Japan Sea, the
Okhotsk Sea, the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Mediterranean, the Labrador Sea
and Baffin Bay, and the marginal (back-arc) basins along the western side of the
Pacific (Beloussov and Ruditch, 1961; Ross, 1974; Sheridan, 1974; Choi, 1984;
Grant, 1992). In plate tectonics, the origin of marginal basins, with their
complex crustal structure, has remained an enigma, and there is no basis for the
assumption that some kind of seafloor spreading must be involved; rather, they
appear to have originated by vertical tectonics (Storetvedt, 1997; Wezel, 1986).
Some plate tectonicists have tried to explain the transitional crust of the
Caribbean in terms of the continentalization of a former deep ocean area,
thereby ignoring the stratigraphic evidence that the Caribbean was a land area
in the Early Mesozoic (Van Bemmelen, 1972).
There are over 100 submarine plateaus and aseismic ridges scattered
throughout the oceans, many of which were once subaerially exposed (Nur and
Ben-Avraham, 1982; Dickins, Choi, and Yeates, 1992; Storetvedt, 1997). They make
up about 10% of the ocean floor. Many appear to be composed of modified
continental crust 20-40 km thick -- far thicker than "normal" oceanic crust.
They often have an upper 10-15 km crust with compressional-wave velocities
typical of granitic rocks in continental crust. They have remained obstacles to
predrift continental fits, and have therefore been interpreted as extinct
spreading ridges, anomalously thickened oceanic crust, or subsided continental
fragments carried along by the "migrating" seafloor. If seafloor spreading is
rejected, they cease to be anomalous and can be interpreted as submerged,
in-situ continental fragments that have not been completely
"oceanized." Shallow-water deposits ranging in age from mid-Jurassic to
Miocene, as well as igneous rocks showing evidence of subaerial weathering, were
found in 149 of the first 493 boreholes drilled in the Atlantic, Indian, and
Pacific Oceans. These shallow-water deposits are now found at depths ranging
from 1 to 7 km, demonstrating that many parts of the present ocean floor were
once shallow seas, shallow marshes, or land areas (Orlenok, 1986; Timofeyev and
Kholodov, 1984). From a study of 402 oceanic boreholes in which shallow-water or
relatively shallow-water sediments were found, Ruditch (1990) concluded that
there is no systematic correlation between the age of shallow-water
accumulations and their distance from the axes of the midoceanic ridges, thereby
disproving the seafloor-spreading model. Some areas of the oceans appear to have
undergone continuous subsidence, whereas others experienced alternating episodes
of subsidence and elevation. The Pacific Ocean appears to have formed mainly
from the Late Jurassic to the Miocene, the Atlantic Ocean from the Late
Cretaceous to the end of the Eocene, and the Indian Ocean during the Paleocene
and Eocene. In the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, modified continental
crust (mostly 10-20 km thick) underlies not only ridges and plateaus but most of
the ocean floor; only in deep-water depressions is typical oceanic crust found.
Since deep-sea drilling has shown that large areas of the North Atlantic were
previously covered with shallow seas, it is possible that much of the North
Atlantic was continental crust before its rapid subsidence (Pavlenkova, 1995,
1998; Sanchez Cela, 1999). Lower Paleozoic continental rocks with trilobite
fossils have been dredged from seamounts scattered over a large area northeast
of the Azores. Furon (1949) concluded that the continental cobbles had not been
carried there by icebergs and that the area concerned was a submerged
continental zone. Bald Mountain, from which a variety of ancient continental
material has been dredged, could certainly be a foundered continental fragment.
In the equatorial Atlantic, shallow-water and continental rocks are ubiquitous
(Timofeyev et al., 1992; Udintsev, 1996). There is evidence that the
midocean ridge system was shallow or partially emergent in Cretaceous to Early
Tertiary time. For instance, in the Atlantic subaerial deposits have been found
on the North Brazilian Ridge (Bader et al., 1971), near the Romanche and Vema
fracture zones adjacent to equatorial sectors of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Bonatti
and Chermak, 1981; Bonatti and Honnorez, 1971), on the crest of the Reykjanes
Ridge, and in the Faeroe-Shetland region (Keith, 1993).
Oceanographic and geological data suggest that a large part of the
Indian Ocean, especially the eastern part, was land ("Lemuria") from the
Jurassic until the Miocene. The evidence includes seismic and palynological data
and subaerial weathering which suggest that the Broken and Ninety East Ridges
were part of an extensive, now sunken landmass; extensive drilling, seismic,
magnetic, and gravity data pointing to the existence an Alpine-Himalayan
foldbelt in the northwestern Indian Ocean, associated with a foundered
continental basement; data that continental basement underlies the Scott,
Exmouth, and Naturaliste plateaus west of Australia; and thick Triassic and
Jurassic sedimentation on the western and northwestern shelves of the Australian
continent which shows progradation and current direction indicating a western
source (Dickins, 1994a; Udintsev, Illarionov, and Kalinin, 1990; Udintsev and
Koreneva, 1982; Wezel, 1988). Geological, geophysical, and dredging data
provide strong evidence for the presence of Precambrian and younger continental
crust under the deep abyssal plains of the present northwest Pacific (Choi,
Vasil'yev, and Tuezov, 1990; Choi, Vasil'yev, and Bhat, 1992). Most of this
region was either subaerially exposed or very shallow sea during the Paleozoic
to Early Mesozoic, and first became deep sea about the end of the Jurassic.
Paleolands apparently existed on both sides of the Japanese islands. They were
largely emergent during the Paleozoic-Mesozoic-Paleogene, but were totally
submerged during Paleogene to Miocene times. Those on the Pacific side included
the great Oyashio paleoland and the Kuroshio paleoland. The latter, which was as
large as the present Japanese islands and occupied the present Nankai Trough
area, subsided in the Miocene, at the same time as the upheaval of the Shimanto
geosyncline, to which it had supplied vast amounts of sediments (Choi, 1984,
1987; Harata et al., 1978; Kumon et al., 1988). There is also evidence of
paleolands in the southwest Pacific around Australia (Choi, 1997) and in the
southeast Pacific during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic (Choi, 1998; Isaacson, 1975;
Bahlburg, 1993; Isaacson and Martinez, 1995).
After surveying the extensive evidence for former continental land
areas in the present oceans, Dickins, Choi, and Yeates (1992) concluded:
We are surprised and concerned for the objectivity and honesty of
science that such data can be overlooked or ignored. ... There is a vast need
for future Ocean Drilling Program initiatives to drill below the base of the
basaltic ocean floor crust to confirm the real composition of what is currently
designated oceanic crust. (p. 198)
Plate tectonics -- the reigning paradigm in the earth sciences -- faces
some very severe and apparently fatal problems. Far from being a simple,
elegant, all-embracing global theory, it is confronted with a multitude of
observational anomalies, and has had to be patched up with a complex variety of
ad-hoc modifications and auxiliary hypotheses. The existence of deep continental
roots and the absence of a continuous, global asthenosphere to "lubricate" plate
motions, have rendered the classical model of plate movements untenable. There
is no consensus on the thickness of the "plates" and no certainty as to the
forces responsible for their supposed movement. The hypotheses of large-scale
continental movements, seafloor spreading and subduction, and the relative youth
of the oceanic crust are contradicted by a substantial volume of data. Evidence
for significant amounts of submerged continental crust in the present-day oceans
provides another major challenge to plate tectonics. The fundamental principles
of plate tectonics therefore require critical reexamination, revision, or
rejection.
References
Geology
and cosmology: a discussion
Problems
with plate tectonics: reply
|